Peer Review Policy
- Purpose:
The peer review process is an essential component of maintaining the integrity, quality, and credibility of the research published in the Journal of Business Management. The purpose of peer review is to ensure that all submitted manuscripts are rigorously evaluated by experts in the field to determine their suitability for publication.
- Peer Review Process:
Upon receipt of a manuscript, the Editor-in-Chief will assign it to an Associate Editor who will oversee the peer review process. The Associate Editor will select a minimum of two qualified reviewers with expertise relevant to the manuscript's subject matter.
- Reviewer Selection:
Reviewers will be selected based on their expertise, experience, and scholarly contributions within the field of business management. Reviewers must have a minimum of a doctoral degree and demonstrate a track record of publication in reputable journals.
- Reviewer Responsibilities:
Reviewers are expected to provide constructive, unbiased, and timely feedback on the manuscript's originality, methodology, significance, and overall quality. Reviewers should maintain confidentiality throughout the review process and disclose any potential conflicts of interest.
- Review Criteria:
Reviewers will evaluate manuscripts based on the following criteria:
- Originality and novelty of the research.
- Methodological rigor and soundness.
- Clarity, coherence, and organization of the manuscript.
- Contribution to the field of business management.
- Ethical considerations and adherence to academic standards.
- Reviewer Reports:
Reviewers will submit detailed reports outlining their evaluation of the manuscript, including strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations for improvement. Reviewers may recommend acceptance, revision, or rejection based on their assessment.
- Editor Decision:
Based on the reviewers' reports, the Associate Editor will make a recommendation to the Editor-in-Chief regarding the manuscript's acceptance, revision, or rejection. The Editor-in-Chief will make the final decision, considering the reviewers' comments and the manuscript's overall suitability for publication.